Shane Dundas

Shane Dundas principally practises in the fields of clinical negligence and fatal accident and public inquires. He has considerable experience acting on behalf of NHS Health Boards and medical indemnity providers in complex and high-profile cases both at first instance and appellate levels. Shane has a particular interest in cases giving rise to medical ethics considerations, having acted in several complex and sensitive cases concerning the treatment of vulnerable patients. He has also provided advice on complex medico-legal issues to several bodies (including Health Boards and charities) in an advisory capacity. He is ranked by Chambers & Partners and the Legal 500 as a leading junior in the areas in which he principally practises.

Directories

Chambers UK Bar – Clinical Negligence, Band 2

Chambers UK Bar – Fatal Accident & Public Inquiries, Up and Coming

Chambers UK Bar – Personal Injury, Up and Coming

Legal 500 – Personal Injury and Medical Negligence, Band 2

Legal 500 – Crime and Regulatory, Band 2

The ‘incredible advocate’ Shane Dundas’s strategic thinking, legal skills, communication and attention to detail are second to none.” (Legal 500, 2026 (Personal Injury and Medical Negligence))

His ability to analyse and bring focus to the core issues of a case makes him an exceptionally skilled advocate to have on your side.” (Chambers & Partners, 2026 (Clinical Negligence – Scotland (Bar))

He has an incredible attention to detail, and his advocacy is of the highest standard.” (Chambers & Partners, 2026 (Public & Fatal Accident Inquiries – Scotland (Bar))

Shane’s depth of knowledge and understanding within the highly complex field of medical litigation is of a golden standard.” (Legal 500, 2025 (Personal Injury and Medical Negligence))

Shane is a standout advocate. I would trust him with any matter I work on… I feel very reassured when I have Shane instructed on a case.” (Chambers & Partners, 2024 (Clinical Negligence – Scotland (Bar))

A dedicated junior with superb judgement.” (Legal 500, 2024  (Personal Injury and Medical Negligence))

An outstanding advocate who is great to work with. He is responsive, proactive and excellent in court.” (Legal 500, 2023  (Personal Injury and Medical Negligence))

Selected cases

Back

Michael Way

Michael Way’s principle areas of practice are public & administrative law, commercial disputes and civil liberties/human rights.

Michael is listed as a ‘Rising Star’ in the 2021/22 Legal 500 in both Commercial Disputes and Administrative and Public Law.

“A brilliant advocate – insightful, thorough and refreshingly convincing on his feet, he is approachable and easy to work with.”  – Legal 500 2021/22 ‘Administrative and Public Law’

After spending several years as a performer in the music industry, Michael trained with one of Scotland’s leading commercial law firms and undertook a six month secondment to the Scottish Government Legal Directorate. Shortly after qualifying as a solicitor Michael began devilling, during which he won the Mike Jones Excellence in Advocacy prize and was the Faculty Scholar 2018/19.

Since calling, Michael has appeared regularly in courts and tribunals throughout Scotland. In particular, he has:

Michael has a strong academic background with degrees from Oxford, King’s College London and Edinburgh. Since 2015, Michael has tutored at the University of Edinburgh (Jurisprudence; Critical Legal Thinking) and was previously a guest lecturer in Business Law at Queen Margaret University. He was the research assistant to Lady Poole and Sheriffs McCartney and Drummond on their recent book A Practical Guide to Public Law Litigation in Scotland (2019; W.Green)

Back

Faculty of Advocates support for human rights National Taskforce

Plans to set up a National Taskforce for Human Rights Leadership have been applauded by the Faculty of Advocates Human Rights and Rule of Law Committee (HRRoL).

The Scottish Government says the Taskforce is to be co-chaired by Shirley Anne Somerville, Cabinet Secretary for Social Security and Older People, and Professor Alan Miller of Strathclyde University.

Its purpose will be to “ensure Scotland is a world leader in putting human rights into practice”.

Ampersand’s Euan Mackenzie QC, of HRRoL, said: “The announcement of the National Taskforce is welcome news for the future of human rights in Scotland. The creation of enforceable rights in areas such as housing, health and social security will make a real difference to people’s lives.

“Alongside the work already under way to incorporate the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), the National Taskforce will cement Scotland’s ambition to provide human rights leadership in these challenging times.

“We look forward to engaging with others in this important work.”

Details of the Taskforce can be found here.

Back

Aidan O’Neill QC gives evidence to House of Lords Justice Sub-Committee looking into Human Rights after Brexit

Ampersand’s Aidan O’Neill QC gave evidence to the House of Lords Justice Sub-Committee looking into Human Rights after Brexit.  The other witnesses in his evidence session were Marie Demetriou QC of Brick Court Chambers and Angela Patrick of Doughty Street Chambers.

You can view the video link of the evidence on the parliamentlive.tv website here.

Back

Ampersand advocates appointed to EHRC panel of counsel

Ampersand welcomes the appointment of Vinit Khurana QC, Ross Anderson and Graham Maciver to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) panel of counsel.

They join Dorothy Bain QC, Aidan O’Neill QC and Laura-Anne van Westhuizen who were re-appointed to the panel.

Members of the Commission’s panel of counsel are the preferred providers of external legal services, including representation and advice. These services support the EHRC’s advisory, influencing, regulatory and enforcement work across the equality and human rights spheres, including strategic litigation in domestic and European courts.

These appointments are for a period of 4 years.

Further information on the work of the EHRC and the full panel of counsel can be found on the EHRC website here.

Back

Case C-621/18 Wightman and others – Decision of the European Court of Justice

The European Court of Justice ruled that the United Kingdom may, if it chooses to, unilaterally revoke its notification of intention to withdraw from the European Union.

Judicial review was brought by a cross-party group of elected politicians from constituencies in Scotland. They wanted to know whether they had the option of voting for the UK staying in the EU, if they thought that that course offered better protection for their constituents than the UK leaving the EU on the basis of the Government’s withdrawal deal.

Court of Session referred the question of EU law which they had raised to the European Court of Justice for its guidance. The UK Supreme Court rejected an appeal. Matter now comes back to the court in Scotland for its final ruling.

They have been represented at every stage in this case by Ampersand’s Aidan O’Neill QC who was instructed as leading counsel by Elaine Motion, Balfour + Manson LLP. Assisted by David Welsh, Advocate and, before the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, also by Maya Lester QC and Professor Piet Eeckhout.

The press release from the Court of Justice of the European Union can be found here and full decision here.

Back